Pol, Nihan S. and Taylor, Stephen R. and Zoltan Kelley, Luke and Vigeland, Sarah J. and Simon, Joseph and Chen, Siyuan and Arzoumanian, Zaven and Baker, Paul T. and Bécsy, Bence and Brazier, Adam and Brook, Paul R. and Burke-Spolaor, Sarah and Chatterjee, Shami and Cordes, James M. and Cornish, Neil J. and Crawford, Fronefield and Thankful Cromartie, H. and DeCesar, Megan E. and Demorest, Paul B. and Dolch, Timothy and Ferrara, Elizabeth C. and Fiore, William and Fonseca, Emmanuel and Garver-Daniels, Nathan and Good, Deborah C. and Hazboun, Jeffrey S. and Jennings, Ross J. and Jones, Megan L. and Kaiser, Andrew R. and Kaplan, David L. and Shapiro Key, Joey and Lam, Michael T. and Lazio, T. Joseph W. and Luo, Jing and Lynch, Ryan S. and Madison, Dustin R. and McEwen, Alexander and McLaughlin, Maura A. and Mingarelli, Chiara M. F. and Ng, Cherry and Nice, David J. and Pennucci, Timothy T. and Ransom, Scott M. and Ray, Paul S. and Shapiro-Albert, Brent J. and Siemens, Xavier and Stairs, Ingrid H. and Stinebring, Daniel R. and Swiggum, Joseph K. and Vallisneri, Michele and Wahl, Haley and Witt, Caitlin A. (2021) Astrophysics Milestones for Pulsar Timing Array Gravitational-wave Detection. The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 911 (2). L34. ISSN 2041-8205
Pol_2021_ApJL_911_L34.pdf - Published Version
Download (1MB)
Abstract
The NANOGrav Collaboration reported strong Bayesian evidence for a common-spectrum stochastic process in its 12.5 yr pulsar timing array data set, with median characteristic strain amplitude at periods of a year of ${A}_{\mathrm{yr}}={1.92}_{-0.55}^{+0.75}\times {10}^{-15}$. However, evidence for the quadrupolar Hellings & Downs interpulsar correlations, which are characteristic of gravitational-wave signals, was not yet significant. We emulate and extend the NANOGrav data set, injecting a wide range of stochastic gravitational-wave background (GWB) signals that encompass a variety of amplitudes and spectral shapes, and quantify three key milestones. (I) Given the amplitude measured in the 12.5 yr analysis and assuming this signal is a GWB, we expect to accumulate robust evidence of an interpulsar-correlated GWB signal with 15–17 yr of data, i.e., an additional 2–5 yr from the 12.5 yr data set. (II) At the initial detection, we expect a fractional uncertainty of 40% on the power-law strain spectrum slope, which is sufficient to distinguish a GWB of supermassive black hole binary origin from some models predicting more exotic origins. (III) Similarly, the measured GWB amplitude will have an uncertainty of 44% upon initial detection, allowing us to arbitrate between some population models of supermassive black hole binaries. In addition, power-law models are distinguishable from those having low-frequency spectral turnovers once 20 yr of data are reached. Even though our study is based on the NANOGrav data, we also derive relations that allow for a generalization to other pulsar timing array data sets. Most notably, by combining the data of individual arrays into the International Pulsar Timing Array, all of these milestones can be reached significantly earlier.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Subjects: | Grantha Library > Physics and Astronomy |
Depositing User: | Unnamed user with email support@granthalibrary.com |
Date Deposited: | 11 May 2023 08:13 |
Last Modified: | 20 Sep 2024 04:06 |
URI: | http://asian.universityeprint.com/id/eprint/889 |