Encouraging Volitional Pedaling in Functional Electrical Stimulation-Assisted Cycling Using Barrier Functions

Isaly, Axton and Allen, Brendon C. and Sanfelice, Ricardo G. and Dixon, Warren E. (2021) Encouraging Volitional Pedaling in Functional Electrical Stimulation-Assisted Cycling Using Barrier Functions. Frontiers in Robotics and AI, 8. ISSN 2296-9144

[thumbnail of pubmed-zip/versions/1/package-entries/frobt-08-742986/frobt-08-742986.pdf] Text
pubmed-zip/versions/1/package-entries/frobt-08-742986/frobt-08-742986.pdf - Published Version

Download (1MB)

Abstract

Stationary motorized cycling assisted by functional electrical stimulation (FES) is a popular therapy for people with movement impairments. Maximizing volitional contributions from the rider of the cycle can lead to long-term benefits like increased muscular strength and cardiovascular endurance. This paper develops a combined motor and FES control system that tasks the rider with maintaining their cadence near a target point using their own volition, while assistance or resistance is applied gradually as their cadence approaches the lower or upper boundary, respectively, of a user-defined safe range. Safety-ensuring barrier functions are used to guarantee that the rider’s cadence is constrained to the safe range, while minimal assistance is provided within the range to maximize effort by the rider. FES stimulation is applied before electric motor assistance to further increase power output from the rider. To account for uncertain dynamics, barrier function methods are combined with robust control tools from Lyapunov theory to develop controllers that guarantee safety in the worst-case. Because of the intermittent nature of FES stimulation, the closed-loop system is modeled as a hybrid system to certify that the set of states for which the cadence is in the safe range is asymptotically stable. The performance of the developed control method is demonstrated experimentally on five participants. The barrier function controller constrained the riders’ cadence in a range of 50 ± 5 RPM with an average cadence standard deviation of 1.4 RPM for a protocol where cadence with minimal variance was prioritized and used minimal assistance from the motor (4.1% of trial duration) in a separate protocol where power output from the rider was prioritized.

Item Type: Article
Subjects: Grantha Library > Mathematical Science
Depositing User: Unnamed user with email support@granthalibrary.com
Date Deposited: 24 Jun 2023 07:30
Last Modified: 24 Jul 2024 09:30
URI: http://asian.universityeprint.com/id/eprint/1291

Actions (login required)

View Item
View Item